Some historians argue that perhaps the
most important change taking place in early
modern Europe was the host of interrelated consequences
stemming from the population increase and inflation
of the long sixteenth century. Unlike
the more dramatic events of this era--Renaissance
and Reformation, Civil War and Revolution--these
economic and social changes were not consciously
appreciated by the bulk of the population, but
they none the less had a significant impact
because they set the context within which the
history of the period unfolded. Discuss
the social and economic changes going on in
early modern Europe between ca 1450 and 1650,
and then show how they
affected any three of the following episodes
which we have discussed: the Reformation in
Germany, the Reformation in England, Renaissance
and Baroque art, the Counter-Reformation, the
French Civil Wars, the European witch craze,
the Revolt of the Netherlands, the English Revolution.
The first two sentences of the question are really
just setting the stage. The students in the class
would (should!) have been familiar with the economic
and social changes (population increase and inflation)
which are mentioned.
After this introduction, the third sentence states
the question. It has two parts.
First, (in red) students are asked to DESCRIBE
the social and economic changes. Fulfilling
these instructions requires that the student
present evidence about various social and economic
changes. The question has already indicated
that population increase and inflation are two
important changes. There were other issues,
however, which the students knew about from
lectures, texts, and other readings. This part
of the answer will need to present a coherent
description of these changes, probably one showing
how they were connected with each other. NOTE
that dates are specified, if the answer does
not begin around 1450 and cover the period through
1650 it will not be complete.
Second, (in blue)
students are told to show how these social and
economic changes affected any three of the events
from the list. All of these events were familiar
(they should have been!) to the students. The
answer to this part of the question thus requires
the student to pick three events and showfor
each onehow the social and economic changes
described in part one of the answer affected
that event. Each event will need to be described
a little bit, but the focus of this part of
the answer should be on showing the relationshipor
the lack of relationshipbetween social
and economic change and the event in question.
The answer to this part of the question REQUIRES
A CLEAR THESIS; the student has to make an argumentthere
is, there is not, a connectionand prove
it.
Structure of the Essay: This essay ought to have
three main parts:
Introduction:
- One paragraph only.
- It should introduce the topic of the essay.
- Then it should state the thesis regarding
the three events.
Part 1, Discussion of Social and Economic Change
- Probably two or more paragraphs
- Each paragraph should focus on one particular
facet of the social and economic change of the
period
- Each paragraph should provide specific examples
illustrating that change: the increase in the
population, the percentage rise in inflation,
the growth of cities...
- Each new subtopic should be linked to the
one which precedes it. The link could be causal
(population increase caused inflation) or relational
(as overall population grew so did number of
people living in cities)
Part 2: The three examples
- Linked to Part 1 by a restatement of the thesis
from the introduction
- At least three paragraphs, one per example,
more if one example takes more than one paragraph.
- Each paragraph (or sub section) should state
a thesis about that example: The witch craze
WAS affected by the increase in population...
- Each paragraph (or sub section) should briefly
describe the eventthe European witch craze
began in...
Each paragraph (or sub section) should provide
specific examples illustrating the point: The
effect of the changing economy on womens
roles in European society helped make the witch
craze more likely...
Read on to see what the students actually did:
Sample Essay
#1:
Both Renaissance and Baroque art
were heavily influenced by the socio-economic
changes in Europe between 1450 and 1650.
In Italy, where money was flowing like water,
art flourished under the support of a growing
merchant and upper class. The large amount
of trade that went on in this period made
Italy a wealthy nation with wealthy patrons.
The Medici's, one of the most infamous rich
families of the period, were heavy supporters
of art. They commissioned paintings, sculptures,
and architecture. In addition to the wealth,
the market economy made it easier for artisans
to group together in guilds. These associations
were used in large cities and ensured the
security of jobs for artists. They were
specialized and grouped according to craft.
Also, the trade that went on during the
time not only allowed goods to travel, but
it took along ideas of different areas in
Europe. Under this system of exchange, people
were exposed to new techniques and styles
which created a plethora of combinations
and masterpieces. Once this economy was
fully established, the wealthy began to
show off their stature by commissioning
Baroque artists. The use of grandeur and
spectacle is characteristic of wealthy lifestyle
and Baroque art. |
Introduction:
This introduction does very well by way
of stating a thesis about one of the three
events students had to analyze, but it makes
NO MENTION of the other two events covered
in the essay. Also, while it introduces
some of the themes of social and economic
change, it does not do so in a coherent
fashion, for it is mostly focused on the
production of works of art. |
The growing
social belief in humanism greatly affected
Renaissance art. The Renaissance masters
appreciated and exhibited the classical
influences of Greek and Roman tradition.
There was an emphasis on a man-centered
world in which man was God's greatest and
most celebrated creation. The change from
Renaissance to Baroque was from a ma-centered
world to a world in motion. The travel that
the Renaissance era had seen led to an expansion
into the New World of the Americas. The
exploration and discovery of the time led
to an artistic exploration. Artists had
mastered form and classicism, and now it
was time to experiment with more creative,
uneven, and even grotesque forms of art.
The political and social unrest of the period
only contributed to the chaos of Baroque
art. Revolts in the Netherlands and England,
and the Civil Wars in France were all part
of the confusion of the day. |
The transition
to this paragraph is not clear; humanism
is not a topic which was introduced in the
previous paragraph. In fact, most of the
topic of the paragraph is unrelated to the
question. There are some specific examples,
but they dont further the argument.
The last sentence introduces, finally, the
other two events which are going to be discussed,
but it does so in the context of the chaos
of baroque art not social and economic
change. |
The Revolt
of the Netherlands might not have been possible
if it weren't for a stable market economy.
The Netherlands flourished with trade and
merchantry, and most of the populace was
well-to-do. As Philip imposed more and more
restrictions on the Netherlands in the form
of unconventional taxation, the revolt gained
more support. The defeat of Spain was largely
do to the wealth of the merchant nation
and the difficulty Spain had holding onto
it New World acquisitions.
Philip not only broke custom economically
in the Netherlands, but he also broke the
custom of toleration. The merchants of the
Netherlands were passive believers who even
allowed the Anabaptists their freedom. Philip
and his strong Catholic belief tried to
make the Netherlands entirely Catholic.
The persecution of Protestants was unacceptable
to Protestants and Catholics alike. This
fueled the revolt against Spain, and the
conflict eventually became one of religion. |
The two paragraphs
on the Revolt of the Netherlands do advance
an argument about how social and economic
change were relevant, but note that the
existence of this change (the growth trade)
was not well developed in Part 1 of the
essay. There are some good examples here. |
Similar
to the Revolt of the Netherlands is the
English Revolution. The conflict between
Parliament and king Charles ended with a
win on Parliament's side. They had the ability
to raise money and they restricted the king's
ability to do the same. Charles had to force
people into giving him money to fight Parliament,
and he gained no moral support for his cause
in doing so. Parliament had more economic
ground to stand on, and Charles was forced
to concede.
Socially, the conflict between the
upper class Arminaians and the middling
Puritans was gaining force. Parliament was
highly opposed to any system of religious
practice that promoted grand ceremony and
pompous display. There was also a break
from custom when Parliament wanted more
power to govern. In this situation, it was
the revolutionaries breaking custom and
the king trying to maintain tradition. |
The transition
to the next two paragraphs on the English
Revolution is simple, but clear (though
it could have been phrased better). The
link to economic change, however, is not
clear since we are not given the necessary
backgroundeither here or aboveto
understand why raising money
was important. Again there are some good
examples, but some, particularly those pertaining
to religion, are not entirely relevant. |
|
GRADE: B- |
|
|
|
The social
and economic conditions indicative of the
"long sixteenth century" (1450-1650)
stemmed from rapid population growth following
the Black Plague of the 1340s, the growth
of the Market Economy, inflation and the
migration into the cities from the countryside.
While these conditions are evidenced in
a number of situations during the time period,
they are best described in the Revolt of
the Netherlands from Spain, the English
Revolution, and the Reformation in Germany. |
Introduction:
A very good introduction. Notice that the
brief outlines of the details on social
and economic change are very clearly laid
out. Also notice that the three events are
introduced. The author implies that the
social and economic changes can explain
these changeshe/she might have been
more explicit on this point. |
Economically,
the long 16th century witnessed
a period of increased inflation while wages
remained nearly the same. If 1500 is taken
as year 0, prices would double by 1550,
triple by 1600, and increase by 5 times
by 1625. Wages, on the other hand, would
increase only by 2 or 2.5% during the same
time period. This would have consequences
for European society, including a decline
in the living standard, which, among urban
workers and peasants, would necessitate
the need for by-employments-moonlighting
in another job to compensate. These economic
conditions would also affect social conditions
in the towns. Journeymen, who before 1500
could hope to become masters of their own
shops through training and eventually setting
up their own shop, could no longer hope
to do this. Money, which had been available
for Wallington through his father, for example,
was no longer accessible. The result was
increased polarization in the towns between
wealthy masters and their hired workers
(who were also skilled enough to be masters).
This also built up resentment among the
lower classes.
Polarization was also evident in
the countryside. With the increase in inflation
the value of food also rose. This was exaggerated
by an increase in population after 1400
which also increased the demand for food
and land. Land became much more of a commodity
and was used in much more rational ways.
Landowners invested in their land to make
the most of it. Rents in kind were replaced
by monetary payments, the "economic
lease" on land developed. Landowners
got richer.
For small family farms, the outcome
was not as good. As the population expanded,
land became less accessible--soon family
plots were not big enough to sufficiently
feed all family members. Younger sons often
went to the towns to look for employment
or farmers would take up by-employments
to compensate. The result was increased
competition in towns between moonlighting
farmers and artisans already there. The
Merchant class began to rise in importance,
economically, socially and politically.
We will see this evidence in bother the
English and Dutch Revolutions.
Also significant socially during
this time period was the rise and spread
of Protestantism. This significantly altered
traditional beliefs and customs in some
countries--particularly the Netherlands
and England. Calvinist Resistance Theory,
in particular, played a role in these two
countries. |
The four following
paragraphs outline very clearly and specifically
the economic and social change mentioned
in the introduction. Specific examples are
givenpercent of population increase,
changes in land ownership etc. Notice how
the transitions at the beginning of each
paragraph neatly link the topics together
by emphasizing similarity or contrast: "Polarization
was also evident
." or "For
small family farms, the outcome was not
good." |
The Revolt
of the Netherlands in indicative of these
changes. Charles V's, but more extensively,
Phillip II's intervention in the political
and religious affairs of the region combined
with the development listed above, directly
led to their revolt.
Philip II, who succeeded his father
as King of Spain in 1558 was an ardent Catholic
who had inherited a great debt. His two
main missions in the Dutch territory he
had inherited were to raise money and impose
Catholicism. Both endeavors were met with
resistance by the Dutch who saw Philip as
a foreign king without their interests at
heart. His attempt to impose taxes with
royal collectors, his attempt to cash in
on the Dike levys and his attempt to impose
Catholicism on the region known for its
"toleration" and sympathy to Protestantism
all met with fierce resistance. The Dutch
were a wealthy nation, made up mostly of
merchants who had risen to high social status
thanks to the economic conditions of the
long 16th century. Their government
was largely autonomous--resembling the HRE's
network of principalities. Calvinist Resistance
Theory has come to the Dutch from Geneva,
creating a political struggle between the
king and his subjects. The inevitable result
of revolution was due to all of these changes
brought about under the long 16th
century. |
The two paragraphs
on the Revolt of the Netherlands begin with
a clear restatement of the thesis. The events
of the revolt are briefly introduced. Because
the social and economic changes in Part
1 were so clearly described, the author
can simply refer to Holland as a wealthy
nation
of merchants" and we know
just what is meant. Lots of good, specific,
relevant examples. |
The English
Revolution, too, is evidence of these social
and economic changes. Like the Dutch, the
middle (merchant) class had risen in power
under the English Parliamentary House of
Commons by the 1640's. The introduction
of Renaissance ideas, including humanism,
had insulated the gentry from the aristocracy's
influence. Parliamentary handling of monetary
affairs made the king rely on them for funds.
Religiously, the Puritans had taken a stronghold
in the House of Commons with a strong sympathy
to Calvinist Resistance Theory. (God's law
is greater than the king's.) Tensions between
the king and Parliament festered over issues
of authority, money and religion. Also in
England, increased population and inflation
led to an increase in social depravity,
something the Puritans felt was their obligation
to remedy and they needed the power to do
so. The English Revolution came about largely
because of the same issues of the Dutch
Revolt. Increased social polarization, tension
between the king and Parliament over authority
and religious issues. |
The paragraph
on the English Revolution again has a clear
thesis. Specific examples social
change > social depravity > puritanism
establish the link promised in the
thesis. (The political issues mentioned
in the paragraph could have been better
integrated into the thesis.) |
The Reformation
of Germany is evident of religious issues,
but it also had social and political motives
too. The decline in living standards game
many motive to convert, seeking in Protestantism
a better life for themselves. It also offered
a chance to resist the elite, as evidenced
in the German peasant's revolt of 1521.
The power of the princes over the Holy Roman
Emperor are also significant (demonstrated
in Frederick the Wise's protection of Luther).
Also the power of the king comes into question--Charles
is forced to concede and allow the Peace
of Augsburg to be implemented in 1555. Luther
appeals to the Christian nobility in 1520,
not the king. |
The paragraph
on the Reformation in Germany again has
a thesis. There are good examples here but
the thesis is not very well established.
(The author was probably running out of
time.) |
|
GRADE A |
|
|
|
| Europe,
between 1450 and 1650 was going through
many changes. Economically, Europe's commerce
was booming, especially along the coastline
where many of the products were first distributed.
Europe's population was also growing after
the many deaths of the Black Plague. New
methods of growing crops allowed for a longer
life for the people.
Socially, Europe was changing in
the way it thought. In education, women
were being taught other subjects besides
household duties and religion. This idea
was helped along with the humanists. Also,
with Johann Gutenberg's invention of the
printing press in the 1500's, the illiteracy
of people decreased. People became more
aware of their surrounding and began searching
for answers. |
Introduction:
There is no thesis in this introduction.
It describes, coherently, the economic and
social changes but does not introduce the
argument of the paper. Essentially, these
two paragraphs are Part 1 of
the essay and the introduction is missing.
The examples given are rather vague and
general except the discussion of printing. |
The Reformation
in German was affected by these changes,
especially with the invention of the printing
press. Many Germans were illiterate. Using
the printing press and woodcuts, it gave
many Germans the opportunity to know what
was occurring at the time. Being able to
know the occurrences of that time, they
were able to voice their opinions. |
This paragraph
on the Reformation in Germany has a thesis,
but the proof of the thesis is very very
narrow and not very specific. The only issue
discussed is printing; economic change,
population growth etc. receive no mention.
The Reformation itself is not really described. |
The changes
also affected Renaissance and Baroque art.
Finally women were given the chance to pursue
a career in art. Many humanists called for
educating women in other subjects. This
soon opened schools for women. Also, new
styles of painting were emerging. The paintings
and other artwork were becoming more realistic
and natural and lifelike. No more of those
elongated bodies, or unproportioned bodies. |
The paragraph
on Renaissance and Baroque art also has
a thesis, and the changes in artistic styles
are mentioned. However, the relationship
of womens education to art is not
explained. Moreover, the changes in artistic
style is not linked to social and economic
change. |
The witch
craze brought change in that it propelled
the thought of finding the truth of how
things worked and why it happened. Things
that were seen as out of the ordinary was
blamed as being the work of witches. It
was soon recognized that these things weren't
occurring because of magic or sorcery. This
led them to search for the real answers,
and the invention and founding of many of
the ideas we still hold today. For example,
Copernicus's theory that it wasn't the Earth
that was the center of the universe, as
suggested by Ptolemy, but it was rather
the sun that was at the center of the universe.
Many people found that hard to believe then,
but it eventually was found that Copernicus
was right in his theory. |
The paragraph
on the witch craze sort of states a thesis.
However the craze itself is not described
and the specific example givenchanges
in the understanding of astronomydoes
not really relate to the question. |
|
Grade: C or
C - |
|
|